Burden of proof (philosophy) facts for kids

The burden of proof (also called onus probandi) is about who needs to show evidence for something they say. Imagine you are in a discussion or a debate. If you make a statement, especially one that others might not agree with, it's your job to provide reasons or facts to support what you've said.

This idea is important in many areas, from everyday talks to scientific discussions. It helps make sure that claims are not just accepted without good reasons.

What is the Burden of Proof?

The burden of proof means that if someone makes a claim, they are usually the one who needs to prove it. For example, if you say "All cats can fly," then you have the burden of proof to show evidence of flying cats. If you can't, then your claim isn't accepted as true.

This idea helps us figure out who is responsible for showing facts. It's not the job of others to prove your claim wrong; it's your job to prove your claim right.

Why is it Important?

The burden of proof is very important for fair discussions. It stops people from making wild claims without any basis. If there were no burden of proof, anyone could say anything, and it would be up to others to disprove it, which can be very hard or even impossible.

It helps us focus on facts and evidence. When someone makes a claim, we can ask, "What proof do you have?" This encourages people to think carefully and gather information before stating something as true.

Carl Sagan's Rule

A famous scientist named Carl Sagan once said something very important about proof: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." This means if you make a really big or unusual claim, you need really strong and clear proof to back it up.

For example, if you claim you saw a unicorn, that's an extraordinary claim. Just saying "I saw it" might not be enough. You would need extraordinary evidence, like a clear photo or video, to convince others. This rule is often called the Sagan standard.

How it Works in Debates

In many discussions, especially philosophical ones, people sometimes spend time arguing about who has the burden of proof. Instead of debating the main topic, they might argue about whose turn it is to show evidence.

It's usually the person who is trying to change what most people believe, or who is making a new claim, who has the burden of proof. If you are just agreeing with what is generally accepted, you might not have to prove anything unless someone challenges it.

For example, if you say "The Earth goes around the Sun," you don't usually need to prove it because it's a widely accepted scientific fact. But if you say "The Sun goes around the Earth," you would have a huge burden of proof to show evidence against all the science we know.

Images for kids

• 

  A robot thinking about proof.