Memorandum opinion facts for kids
| Judicial opinions & aggregates for official decisions (O.S-Federal) |
|---|
|
Majority opinion |
In law, a memorandum opinion is a special kind of legal opinion. Think of a legal opinion as a judge's written decision about a case. A memorandum opinion is usually not published, meaning it's not widely shared or printed in official law books.
Because it's not published, it generally cannot be used as a precedent. A precedent is like a past example or rule that judges use to help decide similar cases in the future. Memorandum opinions are often short and don't explain much. This is because they usually deal with legal ideas that are already very clear or don't involve new legal questions. Also, you usually cannot appeal (ask a higher court to review) a memorandum opinion.
Memorandum opinions still follow the usual rules of law. This includes using existing precedents and a rule called stare decisis. Stare decisis is a Latin phrase that means "to stand by things decided." It's the idea that courts should stick to decisions made in earlier cases.
Contents
What is a Memorandum Opinion?
A memorandum opinion is a brief written decision from a court, often from an appeals court. It simply states what the court decided. It usually does not give a lot of details or reasons why. This happens when the decision is based on a legal rule that is already very well known. It can also happen if the decision does not involve a new legal question.
Why Are They Not Published?
Most court decisions are published so that lawyers and other judges can read them. They can then use these past decisions as examples for new cases. However, memorandum opinions are usually not published. This is because they often don't offer new legal ideas or interpretations. They simply apply existing rules to a specific situation. Because they don't create new legal rules, they are not usually used as precedents.
How Do They Differ from Other Opinions?
Other types of legal opinions, like "published opinions," are usually much longer. They explain in detail the facts of the case, the legal rules applied, and the reasons for the court's decision. These published opinions are very important because they help shape the law and serve as precedents for future cases. Memorandum opinions are different because they are short, less detailed, and do not set new legal examples.
Understanding Legal Precedent
When judges make decisions, they often look at how similar cases were decided in the past. This is called following precedent. It helps make sure that the law is fair and consistent for everyone. If a judge decides a case in a certain way, future judges might use that decision as a guide if they have a similar case.
The Rule of Stare Decisis
The idea of following precedent is closely linked to stare decisis. This Latin term means "to stand by things decided." It's a fundamental principle in many legal systems. It means that courts should generally follow their own past decisions and the decisions of higher courts in similar cases. This helps make the law predictable and stable.
Why is Stare Decisis Important?
Stare decisis is important for several reasons:
- Fairness: It ensures that similar cases are treated in similar ways.
- Predictability: People can better understand what the law is and how it might apply to them.
- Efficiency: Judges don't have to rethink every legal question from scratch in every new case.
Can You Appeal a Memorandum Opinion?
Generally, you cannot appeal a memorandum opinion. An appeal is when someone asks a higher court to review a lower court's decision because they believe there was a mistake. Since memorandum opinions often deal with clear legal points or don't set new legal rules, they are usually considered final decisions for that specific case.
