Craig Rhos-y-felin facts for kids
Craig Rhos-y-felin is a cool rocky spot in the Preseli Hills in Wales. It's special because of its interesting rocks and how the land was formed. Some people think it might have been a very old quarry. This means people long ago might have taken stones from here. These stones might have even been used to build Stonehenge!
Contents
What is Craig Rhos-y-felin?
Craig Rhos-y-felin is a unique rock formation. It's located on the north side of the Preseli Hills. Experts call it a "Regionally Important Geological Site." This is because its rocks and land features are very special.
A Mystery: Was it a Stone Age Quarry?
One of the biggest questions about Craig Rhos-y-felin is whether it was a quarry. A quarry is a place where people dig up rocks. Some archaeologists believe that people in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages used this site. These periods were about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago. They think people took stones from here and another place called Carn Goedog.
Stones for Stonehenge?
The most exciting idea is that stones from Craig Rhos-y-felin went to Stonehenge. These stones are a type of rock called foliated rhyolite. Pieces of this rock have been found at Stonehenge. Some experts believe these pieces are "debitage." This means they are leftover bits from shaping the stones.
Why This Spot?
Some people think Craig Rhos-y-felin was a good place to get stones. The rocks there are shaped like pillars. This might have made it easier to break them off. It could have been simpler than getting stones from other places.
The Big Debate
Not everyone agrees that Craig Rhos-y-felin was a quarry. Some experts think all the features there are natural. They believe the rocks just broke off on their own. They say that if ancient people wanted big stones, they could have found them easily. There were many large, loose rocks scattered around the landscape. These rocks were left behind by glaciers.
When Did the Idea Start?
The idea that Craig Rhos-y-felin was a quarry first came up in 2011. However, this idea was challenged a few years later. In 2015, some researchers published articles. They argued against the quarry idea. They believe the site shows only signs of people living there now and then.
