Ealdred v High Sheriff of Yorkshire facts for kids
Ealdred v Malet was an important court case in early English law. It happened around the year 1068. The case was between Ealdred, who was the Archbishop of York, and William Malet, the High Sheriff of Yorkshire. Archbishop Ealdred wanted to get back lands that the Sheriff had taken during the Norman Conquest.
Contents
What Was the Ealdred v Malet Case About?
This court case was about land. Archbishop Ealdred believed that Sheriff William Malet had unfairly taken some of his lands. This happened during the time of the Norman Conquest, when William the Conqueror took over England. Ealdred wanted his lands returned to him.
Why Was Archbishop Ealdred So Powerful?
Archbishop Ealdred was a very important person. He was like a top advisor to William the Conqueror. Because of this, he had "the king's ear." This means the king listened to him and respected his opinions. This made it easier for Ealdred to bring his complaint to court.
How Did the Court Case Work?
In those days, the law was different from today. There wasn't a strict system like the Common Law that developed later under William's grandson. Ealdred's complaint, called a "plaint," was more informal. Even so, the court decided in his favor. The lands were given back to the Archbishop. Sheriff William Malet was also told off for his actions.
Why Was This Case Important for England?
The case of Ealdred v Malet was more than just a dispute over land. It was part of a bigger picture. Many people were trying to fight against "Normanization." This was a process where the Normans, who had conquered England, were taking control of everything.
How Did Normanization Change England?
Within about ten years of the Norman Conquest, a huge amount of land in England changed hands. About 64 percent of all the land ended up belonging to only 150 people. These were mostly Norman lords and knights. Many English nobles, who had owned land for generations, lost their estates. The Ealdred v Malet case showed that some people were fighting back against these changes. It was a small victory for those who felt their lands were unfairly taken.
