Stationary-action principle facts for kids

This page is about the history of the principle of least action. For the application, see Action (physics).

The stationary-action principle – also known as the principle of least action – is a variational principle that, when applied to the action of a mechanical system, yields the equations of motion for that system. The principle states that the trajectories (i.e. the solutions of the equations of motion) are stationary points of the system's action functional.

The principle can be used to derive Newtonian, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations of motion, and even general relativity, as well as classical electrodynamics and quantum field theory. In these cases, a different action must be minimized or maximized. For relativity, it is the Einstein–Hilbert action. For quantum field theory, it involves the path integral formulation.

The classical mechanics and electromagnetic expressions are a consequence of quantum mechanics. The stationary action method helped in the development of quantum mechanics. In 1933, the physicist Paul Dirac demonstrated how this principle can be used in quantum calculations by discerning the quantum mechanical underpinning of the principle in the quantum interference of amplitudes. Subsequently Julian Schwinger and Richard Feynman independently applied this principle in quantum electrodynamics.

The principle remains central in modern physics and mathematics, being applied in thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, particle physics, and string theory and is a focus of modern mathematical investigation in Morse theory. Maupertuis' principle and Hamilton's principle exemplify the principle of stationary action.

The action principle is preceded by earlier ideas in optics. In ancient Greece, Euclid wrote in his Catoptrica that, for the path of light reflecting from a mirror, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. Hero of Alexandria later showed that this path was the shortest length and least time.

Scholars often credit Pierre Louis Maupertuis for formulating the principle of least action because he wrote about it in 1744 and 1746. However, Leonhard Euler also discussed the principle in 1744, and evidence shows that Gottfried Leibniz preceded both by 39 years.

General statement
Further development
Disputes about possible teleological aspects
See also

General statement

As the system evolves, q traces a path through configuration space (only some are shown). The path taken by the system (red) has a stationary action (δS = 0) under small changes in the configuration of the system (δq).

The action, denoted $\mathcal{S}$ , of a physical system is defined as the integral of the Lagrangian L between two instants of time $t 1$ and $t 2$ – technically a functional of the $N$ generalized coordinates $q = (q 1, q 2, ... , q N)$ which are functions of time and define the configuration of the system:

$\mathbf{q} : \mathbf{R} \to \mathbf{R}^N$ $\mathcal{S}[\mathbf{q}, t_1, t_2] = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(\mathbf{q}(t),\mathbf{\dot{q}}(t), t) dt$ where the dot denotes the time derivative, and $t$ is time.

Mathematically the principle is $\delta \mathcal{S} = 0 ,$ where δ (lowercase Greek delta) means a small change. In words this reads:

The path taken by the system between times

t 1

and

t 2

and configurations q₁ and q₂ is the one for which the action is stationary (no change) to first order.

Stationary action is not always a minimum, despite the historical name of least action. It is a minimum principle for sufficiently short, finite segments in the path.

In applications the statement and definition of action are taken together: $\delta \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(\mathbf{q}, \mathbf{\dot{q}},t) dt = 0 .$

The action and Lagrangian both contain the dynamics of the system for all times. The term "path" simply refers to a curve traced out by the system in terms of the coordinates in the configuration space, i.e. the curve $q (t)$ , parameterized by time (see also parametric equation for this concept).

Further development

Euler continued to write on the topic; in his Réflexions sur quelques loix générales de la nature (1748), he called action "effort". His expression corresponds to modern potential energy, and his statement of least action says that the total potential energy of a system of bodies at rest is minimized, a principle of modern statics.

Lagrange and Hamilton

Main page: Hamilton's principle

Much of the calculus of variations was stated by Joseph-Louis Lagrange in 1760 and he proceeded to apply this to problems in dynamics. In Mécanique analytique (1788) Lagrange derived the general equations of motion of a mechanical body. William Rowan Hamilton in 1834 and 1835 applied the variational principle to the classical Lagrangian function $L = T - V$ to obtain the Euler–Lagrange equations in their present form.

Jacobi, Morse and Caratheodory

In 1842, Carl Gustav Jacobi tackled the problem of whether the variational principle always found minima as opposed to other stationary points (maxima or stationary saddle points); most of his work focused on geodesics on two-dimensional surfaces. The first clear general statements were given by Marston Morse in the 1920s and 1930s, leading to what is now known as Morse theory. For example, Morse showed that the number of conjugate points in a trajectory equalled the number of negative eigenvalues in the second variation of the Lagrangian. A particularly elegant derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation was formulated by Constantin Caratheodory and published by him in 1935.

Gauss and Hertz

Other extremal principles of classical mechanics have been formulated, such as Gauss's principle of least constraint and its corollary, Hertz's principle of least curvature.

d'Alembert

For systems with nonholonomic constraints, Hamilton's principle is replaced by the d'Alembert principle. In this case the action $\mathcal{S}[\mathbf{q}, t_1, t_2]$ is imposed to be stationary only for variations $\delta \mathbf{q}(t)$ that are consistent with the constraints.

Disputes about possible teleological aspects

The mathematical equivalence of the differential equations of motion and their integral counterpart has important philosophical implications. The differential equations are statements about quantities localized to a single point in space or single moment of time. For example, Newton's second law $\mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a}$ states that the instantaneous force F applied to a mass m produces an acceleration a at the same instant. By contrast, the action principle is not localized to a point; rather, it involves integrals over an interval of time and (for fields) an extended region of space. Moreover, in the usual formulation of classical action principles, the initial and final states of the system are fixed, e.g.,

Given that the particle begins at position x₁ at time t₁ and ends at position x₂ at time t₂, the physical trajectory that connects these two endpoints is an extremum of the action integral.

In particular, the fixing of the final state has been interpreted as giving the action principle a teleological character which has been controversial historically. However, according to W. Yourgrau and S. Mandelstam, the teleological approach... presupposes that the variational principles themselves have mathematical characteristics which they de facto do not possess In addition, some critics maintain this apparent teleology occurs because of the way in which the question was asked. By specifying some but not all aspects of both the initial and final conditions (the positions but not the velocities) we are making some inferences about the initial conditions from the final conditions, and it is this "backward" inference that can be seen as a teleological explanation. Teleology can also be overcome if we consider the classical description as a limiting case of the quantum formalism of path integration, in which stationary paths are obtained as a result of interference of amplitudes along all possible paths.

The short story Story of Your Life by the speculative fiction writer Ted Chiang contains visual depictions of Fermat's Principle along with a discussion of its teleological dimension. Keith Devlin's The Math Instinct contains a chapter, "Elvis the Welsh Corgi Who Can Do Calculus" that discusses the calculus "embedded" in some animals as they solve the "least time" problem in actual situations.