Craig v. Radford facts for kids
Quick facts for kids Craig et. al. v. Radford |
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Decided March 12, 1818 | |
| Full case name | Craig et. al. v. Radford |
| Citations | 16 U.S. 594 (more)
3 Wheat. 594, 4 L. Ed. 467
|
| Holding | |
| Decree affirmed with costs | |
| Court membership | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Washington, joined by unanimous |
Craig et al. v. Radford was an important case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 12, 1818. Justice Bushrod Washington delivered the court's decision. This case was about who truly owned a piece of land in Kentucky. The land was located near the Ohio River, about 30 miles from where the Scioto River joins it.
The problem started because two different groups claimed to own the same land. One claim came from a "military land warrant" given in 1774 to William Sutherland, a veteran of the French and Indian War. The other claim came from "treasury warrants" bought in 1780 by John Craig and others. Both groups had official papers (patents) for parts of the same land.
A lower court, the United States Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky, decided that William Sutherland's original claim was the valid one. Craig and his group appealed this decision to the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court agreed with the lower court. This case has been important ever since for understanding the property rights of people who are not citizens.
Some famous people who owned parts of this land early on included William Clark, William Radford, and Stephen W. Kearny.
Contents
Why Did the Dispute Start?
The Treaty of Paris in 1763 ended the French and Indian War. This treaty changed how land in North America was divided between Britain and Spain. After the war, King George of Britain made a special announcement called a royal proclamation.
In this announcement, the King told his governors to give land to war veterans. The amount of land depended on their military rank. The King also set aside a large area west of the Appalachian Mountains as an Indian Reserve. This was because the Cherokee and other Native American tribes hunted in this area, even though they didn't live there. The King said that any land claims by settlers in this reserve were not valid, and he ordered all settlers to leave.
However, many colonists really wanted the open land, especially the beautiful Bluegrass Region in Kentucky. Settlers who were already living there felt they had "cabin rights" just by being there. Newcomers believed they could claim land by building a cabin and farming it, following a rule called the "homestead principle." Because of this, the boundary of the Indian Reserve kept moving westward. British agents made new agreements, like the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, to get more land. Some people even bought land directly from tribes, like for the Transylvania Colony. But these deals often ignored the western tribes north of the Ohio River, like the Shawnee and Miami. This led to dangerous conflicts as more settlers arrived.
In 1772, John Murray, 4th Earl of Dunmore, who was the last British Governor of Colony of Virginia, created Fincastle County. This county stretched all the way to the Mississippi River. He chose William Preston to be the main surveyor for this huge area.
In 1773, Lord Dunmore finally issued the land warrants that were promised to French and Indian War veterans. These warrants covered land south of the Ohio River. In April 1774, teams of surveyors went out to map thousands of acres. On May 4, 1774, a surveyor named Hancock Taylor mapped 1,000 acres for William Sutherland. Sutherland had been an Ensign in the army. Later that year, on July 27, 1774, Native Americans attacked Taylor's survey party near what is now Carrollton. Taylor was wounded and later died. His notes were delivered to William Preston, who officially recorded all of Taylor's surveys.
Virginia changed its county system in December 1774, and the Sutherland property then became part of Kentucky County, Virginia. When the American Revolutionary War began, William Sutherland, who supported the British (a "Loyalist"), left Virginia. But he still owned his land in Kentucky.
In 1780, John Craig, Lewis Craig, and Simon Kenton bought "treasury warrants." They used these warrants to claim land that overlapped with Sutherland's property. Their claims were surveyed in 1785, and they received their official land patents by May 26, 1788. However, the state of Virginia didn't officially give Sutherland his patent for the 1,000 acres until August 5, 1788.
Kentucky County was divided into three new counties in 1780. These counties became part of the new Commonwealth of Kentucky when it was formed in 1792. The disputed land ended up in Fayette County, Kentucky.
Starting in 1796, William Sutherland began advertising his land for sale. On February 13, 1799, a land buyer named William Radford bought Sutherland's 1,000-acre deed for $3,000. Radford found that some people were already living on his new land and refused to leave. So, on December 2, 1800, he started a lawsuit in a special court called a chancery court.
William Radford died in 1803, but his son, John Radford, continued the lawsuit. The court records for the final decision are missing. In 1808, John Radford and his family moved to the disputed property, which was now in Lewis County, Kentucky.
What Were the Objections?
Most of the facts about the land dispute were agreed upon by both sides. However, Craig and his group raised four main objections to Sutherland's claim:
- Was the surveyor allowed to do the survey? Craig's side argued that surveyor Taylor didn't have the original land warrant, so he couldn't legally survey the land.
- Was the survey actually finished? They claimed there was no physical proof of Taylor's survey. Also, a witness said the survey was started but not completed.
- Can an incomplete survey be made official? Craig's group argued that if a deputy surveyor didn't finish the lines, the main surveyor shouldn't have been able to make the land grant official.
- Did Sutherland lose his land because he was a Loyalist? They said that Sutherland, as a "Tory" (a Loyalist who supported Britain during the American Revolution), was an enemy. They believed he should have lost his land when Virginia joined the United States.
How Was the Case Decided?
The Supreme Court rejected all four of Craig's objections. All the justices agreed with the decision.
- Yes, the survey was valid. The Court said that the main surveyor's official certificate, which mentioned the land warrant, was enough to make the survey legal.
- Minor survey problems don't cancel the claim. The Court ruled that small mistakes or incomplete parts of a survey do not make the claim to the land invalid.
- Deputy surveyors have full authority. The Court stated that a deputy surveyor has the same power as the main surveyor. Since the main surveyor accepted Taylor's survey as complete, it was valid.
- Sutherland kept his land. The Court found that Virginia had not passed any laws before 1794 to take land from British owners. Also, the Jay Treaty (a treaty signed in 1794) protected these land rights from that point on.
Why Was This Decision Made?
In traditional English law, people who were not citizens (aliens) could buy land. However, the king still had a special interest in that land. If a war broke out, enemy aliens would automatically lose their land. This old rule was used as an argument in this case.
But the Supreme Court decided that land owned by British subjects, who became "aliens" because of the Revolutionary War, was protected. This protection came from the Treaty of Paris that ended the war. To take back land from British subjects, each state would have had to pass specific laws and go through special legal steps. Virginia did not do this. So, because of the protection from the Jay Treaty in 1794, William Sutherland, a British subject, kept the title to his 1,000 acres of land.
Interesting Facts
John Radford, who continued the lawsuit, died in a hunting accident in 1817, before the Supreme Court made its decision the next year. His wife, Harriet Kennerly Radford, moved with her children to Saint Louis, Missouri. She later married William Clark (the famous explorer) in 1821, after his first wife passed away.
In 1774, William Preston wrote a letter to George Washington describing the increasing attacks on surveyors and settlers in Kentucky. These attacks led to a conflict known as Lord Dunmore's War and later to other conflicts like the Illinois Campaign and the Northwest Indian War.
Some people have argued that this case, by giving rights to non-citizens based on federal treaties, went beyond what the U.S. Constitution allowed. They believe that land titles should be decided by state laws, not federal treaties.
