Legal aspects of ritual slaughter facts for kids

Legal rules for religious animal slaughter around the world:      Stunning not required      Stunning after the cut is needed      Stunning at the same time as the cut is needed      Stunning before the cut is needed      Religious slaughter is not allowed      No information

Religious animal slaughter involves special rules for how animals are killed for food, following religious laws like kashrut (Jewish) and halal (Islamic). Governments often have laws about these practices, covering everything from the slaughterhouse to the butcher and even the religious leaders involved. These laws make sure that religious traditions are followed while also considering other important issues.

One of the biggest debates about religious slaughter is whether animals should be stunned (made unconscious) before they are killed. Some people believe stunning is important for animal welfare, meaning it helps prevent suffering. Others believe that their religious laws require the animal to be fully conscious when it is killed. This difference of opinion often leads to disagreements and legal challenges.

How Laws Shape Religious Slaughter

Laws in many countries affect every step of religious animal slaughter, from the farm to the store. For example, in the United States, courts have made decisions about how kosher butchers can work and how kosher meat is labeled. These rules help ensure that religious food laws are followed correctly.

One important case, Jones v. Butz, showed that the government can allow religious slaughter methods without favoring one religion over another. The court said that by letting people eat meat prepared according to their faith, the government is not creating a religion. Instead, it is supporting religious freedom.

The Humane Slaughter Act in the United States defines religious slaughter as a humane way to kill animals for food. It states that animals can be killed according to Jewish or Islamic rules, where the animal quickly loses consciousness. This is seen as one of two humane methods, the other being stunning.

Sometimes, religious groups have argued that these laws limit their religious freedom. Also, governments have tried to control religious animal sacrifices that are not for food. In the US, the Supreme Court ruled in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah that a city could not ban Santería animal sacrifices. The court found that the ban unfairly targeted the religion.

The discussions around religious slaughter can sometimes become difficult. People might bring up concerns about antisemitism (prejudice against Jewish people) or xenophobia (dislike of people from other countries).

Religious Slaughter Practices

Religious laws guide how animals are slaughtered. The main goal is to ensure the meat is acceptable for consumption according to the faith.

Islamic Rules

In Islamic law, the animal is killed with a single, quick cut to the throat. Many Muslim religious leaders agree that stunning the animal before the cut is allowed, as long as the stunning does not kill the animal and it can recover. This is called 'reversible stunning'. For example, electrostunning (using electricity to make the animal unconscious) is often accepted. In 2014, a large amount of halal meat in the United Kingdom came from animals that were pre-stunned.

Jewish Rules

Jewish law also requires a single, quick cut to the throat for cattle and poultry. Most Orthodox Jewish communities do not allow stunning before slaughter. They believe the animal must be fully conscious when the cut is made.

However, some Reform Jews and Conservative Jews have different views. Some Reform Jews think that animal ethics are more important than strict dietary rules. Within Conservative Judaism, many accept meat from animals that were stunned before slaughter as kosher.

Jewish ritual slaughterers, called shochtim, must be very religious and follow strict rules. Because Orthodox Jews do not accept pre-stunning, most kosher meat is produced by Orthodox shochtim.

Past Bans on Religious Slaughter (Before 1945)

Throughout history, some rulers and countries have banned or limited religious animal slaughter.

Bans in Asia

Some rulers in Asia, like King Bayinnaung in Burma (now Myanmar) in 1559, banned the practice of halal slaughter. Others, like Emperor Tenmu in Japan in 675, banned eating meat entirely for certain periods.

Bans in Europe Until 1945

In the late 1800s, groups against Jewish people (anti-Semites) worked with animal protection societies to try and ban Jewish ritual slaughter (shechita) in countries like Switzerland, Germany, and Scandinavia.

• Switzerland: Shechita was banned across Switzerland in 1893 after a public vote. This was the first time the Swiss people voted on a national policy using a referendum. Even though the government was against the ban, the public voted for it.
• Sweden: Sweden banned shechita for cattle in 1937 and for poultry in 1989. The law made stunning mandatory before slaughter.
• Norway: Norway banned religious slaughter without pre-stunning in 1929.
• Germany: Three months after Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, Germany banned shechita nationwide. Similar bans were put in place in countries that the Nazis occupied, including Poland in 1939. These bans were removed by the Allied forces after World War II.

Many people believe that these historical bans were often driven by anti-Jewish feelings rather than just animal welfare concerns.

Religious Slaughter Laws in Europe

In Europe today, animal welfare laws come from several sources: the Council of Europe, the European Union (EU), and individual country laws. These laws often try to balance animal protection with religious freedom.

Council of Europe Rules

Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. This includes the freedom to practice one's religion, like performing religious slaughter. However, this right can be limited if it is "necessary in a democratic society." As of 2020, the European Court of Human Rights has not made a final decision on whether stunning requirements go against this convention.

Another Council of Europe treaty, the European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Slaughter (1979), generally requires stunning before slaughter. But it allows countries to make exceptions for religious slaughter.

European Union Rules

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested in 2004 that stunning before the cut should always be done because of animal welfare concerns. However, the EU's 2009 Slaughter Regulation still allows religious slaughter without stunning.

The European Court of Justice has ruled that meat from unstunned animals cannot carry the EU organic logo. In 2020, the court also ruled that EU countries can require reversible stunning before the cut to improve animal welfare.

Meat from unstunned animals can be moved freely between countries in the Schengen Area.

EU Member State Laws

Legal rules for religious animal slaughter in Europe 2018:      Stunning not required      Stunning after the cut is needed      Stunning at the same time as the cut is needed      Stunning before the cut is needed      Religious slaughter is not allowed      No information

Austria

In Austria, a ban on unstunned religious slaughter was found to be against the constitution in 1998. The court said it limited religious freedom too much. However, the 2004 Animal Protection Act made stunning after the cut mandatory across the country.

Belgium

In Belgium, the regions of Wallonia and Flanders banned unstunned religious slaughter in 2018 and 2019. The city of Brussels is still discussing a ban. The European Court of Justice confirmed in 2020 that these bans are allowed under EU law to promote animal welfare.

Denmark

In February 2014, Denmark banned religious slaughter without prior stunning. While unstunned meat can still be imported, all religious slaughter done in Denmark must now include stunning.

Finland

Finland's law from 1934 allows stunning after the cut, which permits kosher slaughter and some forms of Muslim slaughter. The debate over shechita in Finland has been ongoing for years.

France

Religious slaughter is allowed in France with some rules. The European Court of Human Rights has said that restricting religious slaughter is okay, as long as it does not make it impossible for religious people to get meat prepared according to their beliefs.

Germany

In 2002, the German Federal Constitutional Court ruled that Germany's ban on religious slaughter was against the country's basic law on religious freedom. The court said that religious slaughterers have a right to practice their religious work. It also said that just allowing imported meat was not enough to protect religious rights.

Latvia

Latvia made religious slaughter legal in 2009. Halal meat is exported from Latvia to other countries, and animals are stunned after the cut.

Luxembourg

Luxembourg has required animals to be stunned before slaughter since 1995. However, a new rule in 2009 created an exception for religious slaughter, if approved by the government.

Netherlands

Religious slaughter is allowed in the Netherlands and is regulated by special rules. In 2011, there was a debate in the Dutch Parliament about banning unstunned religious slaughter. The bill was passed in the Lower House but voted down by the Senate. Now, a veterinarian must be present during religious slaughter, and if the animal does not lose consciousness within 40 seconds, stunning is required.

Poland

Poland banned the slaughter of non-stunned animals in 2013. This caused problems for its meat export business. However, in December 2014, the Polish Constitutional Court overturned the ban. The court stated that animal protection does not come before the constitutional right to religious freedom.

Slovenia

In 2012, Slovenia changed its Animal Welfare Act to ban all types of religious slaughter. A group of Muslims challenged this law, saying it violated their religious freedom. But in 2018, the court upheld the ban, stating that the constitution does not allow animals to suffer unnecessarily.

Spain

In Spain, animal welfare laws allow for religious slaughter without stunning if it conflicts with religious rules. However, the slaughter must be supervised by an official veterinarian.

Sweden

In Sweden, all domestic animals must be stunned before slaughter. Religious slaughter of cattle without stunning has been banned since 1937, and for poultry since 1989.

Non-EU Council of Europe Member State Laws

Norway

Norway banned religious slaughter without pre-stunning in 1929. The debate leading to this ban involved animal protection groups and some anti-Jewish individuals. After the ban, Norwegian Jews had to import kosher meat.

Switzerland

Switzerland banned unstunned slaughter in 1893 after a public vote. This meant all animals had to be stunned before slaughter. This ban was influenced by anti-Jewish feelings at the time. However, a 1978 law allows for the import of kosher and halal meat from other countries. There have been proposals to ban the import of unstunned meat, but these have not passed.

Turkey

Stunning is not required in Turkey. However, animal welfare groups are working to encourage slaughterhouses and religious leaders to use stunning, as it is seen as more humane and does not go against Islamic law. Some companies have started stunning animals because it is faster and cleaner.

United Kingdom

Unstunned religious slaughter is legal in the UK, but it is a topic of much debate. Animal welfare groups argue that it causes suffering, while some religious groups say it is essential for their faith.

In 2003, a government advisory group recommended banning unstunned religious slaughter, but the British government rejected this advice. Figures from 2012 showed that over 80% of animals slaughtered for halal meat in the UK were pre-stunned. However, after a public debate in 2014, the percentage of unstunned halal meat increased.

Other Countries

Laws about religious slaughter vary greatly around the world. Some countries have bans, while others protect the practice.

Canada

Unstunned religious slaughter is legal in Canada, as long as the animals do not suffer unnecessarily. Canadian law allows licensed religious slaughterers to skip stunning if it is required by Jewish or Islamic law.

India

India's Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act from 1960 aims to prevent animal suffering. While it generally requires stunning in slaughterhouses, it also states that killing an animal in a way required by a religion is not an offense. However, newer regulations from 2011 make stunning mandatory in slaughterhouses, listing specific methods like CO2 asphyxiation and electric shock. There is still debate among religious scholars in India about whether stunning before religious slaughter is acceptable.

New Zealand

In 2010, New Zealand banned kosher slaughter, but this ban was later partly overturned. As of 2018, all religious slaughter in New Zealand requires stunning before the cut, except for Jewish (kosher) slaughter of poultry.

United States

The United States has laws that protect Jewish (shechita) and Muslim (dhabiha) religious slaughter. The Humane Slaughter Act defines these as humane methods of slaughter.

In the case of Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993), the Supreme Court of the United States struck down a city's ban on Santería animal sacrifices. The court found that the city's ban was motivated by dislike for the Santería religion, not just animal welfare or public health.

Temple Grandin, a well-known animal welfare expert, has developed methods for humane religious slaughter that avoid cruel practices like shackling and hoisting animals. Her methods are used in many slaughterhouses.

Images for kids

• 

  An order from 1939 banning religious animal slaughter in German-occupied Poland.